Archives
Recent Posts
- Preemptive Strike? What’s The Definition? And Who Always Accuses The Victims Of……
- @crappyairbags vs. Rauhauser Similarities, Anyone?
- Hey Neal Rauhauser
- Mike Rogers? Mike Rogers? Where Have We Heard That Name Before?
- Statement In Re a Criminal Charge
- 5209
- Team Kimberlin Post of the Day
- I'm Going to Blog Bash
- More News From Howard County
- Statement In Re a Peace Order
Blogroll
- Ameristroika
- Blog de KingShamus
- Brooks Bayne Criminal History
- CRO Conservative Report Online
- Dead Citizen's Rights Society
- Foolish Reporter's Foolish Thoughts on the Foolish State of Things
- Gulag Bound
- HogEwash
- Kimberlin Unmasked
- Mike Madden
- Pat Dollard
- The Crying Wolfe Wiki
- TWITTERGATE
- Undead Revolution
The Crying Wolfe on twitter
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.




The flurry of tweets by OccupyRebellion…. can’t decide if it’s more like the ones from Dan….or John R….or Ron. Such bullshit.
Ron’s are”rapid fire”, but I know for sure that those are not him at least….I can make that claim with “certitude”…
I think Gennette’s smart enough not to be fooled by Occupy/Anony/and the like.
Why didn’t you mention these after I mentioned DW to NYDN? Why did you defend him so aggressively? You said that he wasn’t harassing me on Twitter when you had advanced knowledge of his plan to do that. Not saying that You’re lying here, but why should people believe that you “never really looked at the attachments and women’s names”? I’ve answered a lot of questions here, I think these are fair questions.
Can you refresh our memory about what kind of “harrassing” you were subjected to? And I’m asking sincerely.
The reason I ask is that at least some of Weiner’s female followers were apparently unaware that he used his social media connections as targets for his sexual habits. Some of these women and girl(s) followed him for his politics…and even though they may have used girl-crush language, they didn’t all anticipate that he was a guy who sexted and sent naked photos of himself to women who responded to his advances.
And as far as I know the “BFC” was comprised of Dan, a phony, whose real motivations are still not known for sure, plus real online tweeters who didn’t like Weiner’s politics and personality — so when they learned that he was a playboy and that he had this behavior of engaging with attractive female political followers online, they were interested and some of them “warned” some of the Weiner girls that there was more to him than it may have seemed on the surface.
In at least the case of the real teenaged high school girl in Delaware, wouldn’t a warning about him be reasonable, if reasonably delivered?
That’s a gotcha question, Gennette. You didn’t like those so why are you doing the same? Mike has stated repeatedly that while he goes over everything again, he’s posting things that don’t add up to him now or didn’t even back then. Hindsight is always 20/20.
He said, “I never really looked at those attachments and women’s names. It wasn’t until some things happened in October of 2011 that the connection continued to stand out…..”
I don’t know how any of you can expect Mike to think clearly during or after this mess, let alone have an agenda and that’s what you’re implying when you say you doubt that he never really looked at it carefully. I don’t see it that way. Let’s look at this email…
“Hey bro here are the pics I don’t have that twit extension thing where you can attach them to a tweet.”
Ah, bullshit! Here we go again with the “I’m so computer-challenged that I can’t even think of the name of that thing so please help an old fart out, will ya bro-buddy-pal?” *note email sent disguising IP from Mr. Computer-Challenged who evidently doesn’t know how to use a telephone either and can’t because his wife might figure out it’s his voice* Uhhuhhhh….
“If you tweet them to me with an extension I can retweet.” Actually he’s saying, “I need a trusting guy who buys all my bullshit and can’t think of a better sap than you at the moment to do my bidding.”
“Or if you want to do it I’ll retweet anyway, LOL.” Always remember to throw that LOL in there to give your patsy the impression that this is a game and you’re letting him go first.
If Mike was in on this from the start, Dan Wolfe would have never been writing like this to suck him in wherever Dan Wolfe wanted to take him. That email doesn’t read like Mike knew the half of what he was getting into. He was being used.
“That’s a gotcha question, Gennette. You didn’t like those so why are you doing the same?”
That’s the point I was trying to make.